"Vaccine Safety 101" @ MIT University, by guest Steve Kirsch. Invited by MIT Students for Open Inquiry (MSOI) 2023-11-30 NB: This livestream was not a lecture by the University. It appears that in the spirit of free-speech (of which he was invited by MSOI), Steve took some liberties in satire by presenting as a university lecture and suggesting in the same theme that he was a professor (a little humour to lighten a sharp topic) The following video link is the MSOI welcoming introduction for this page's presentation https://www.bitchute.com/video/6eFqkdB01X3W/

Q&A Starts 01:23:56

TRANSCRIPTION of Video https://www.bitchute.com/video/zcybw6IsHANw

Let's now we actually have some MIT undergrads in the audience. So I'm going to teach a short class here 6.123, which is vaccine safety 101. This is my first lecture It's called the basics or seven slides and it's a 12 unit course Okay, and I am professor Kirsch Thank you very much. This is the first slide Now I'm not going to go through these slides in detail But the main thing here is that if you plot the deaths per day since injection of a vaccine and you look at the and you plan the X axis is that's the horizontal axis is the Days after injection what should happen in a safe vaccine that is given to a finite cohort and then you look to see what happens is that the line should slope Downwards over time and the more Elderly the population is the greater the downward slope the more the if it's a normal population It'll slope at point a percent per year is the downward slope Okay But it always slopes downwards and sometimes it can go up and down if there's something happening in the background and you're not Giving the vaccine over all time evenly. Okay, that's so that's a safe vaccine Line slopes down It never slopes up. It always slopes down. This is the most important slide if you get this slide. We're done Okay This is the laws of physics if I drop this it's going to fall down. It never falls up I can drop this many many times. It will never go up. It will always go down It's the same thing for people dying people die. They don't suddenly spring from the dead Okay, that's just the way it works This is physics We're an MIT. Here's the cheat sheet. This is the simple thing. The line should always go down get it Okay, good If by the way these slides are posted on my sub stack if you don't understand any of these slides you can go back and study them Okay a safe and effective vaccine Before and after if it really works and is effective the wine is slightly lower But it still slopes down and the fluctuations for a particular Virus will be smaller if the vaccine worked. This is the sign of a vaccine which is effective Now this is going to be news to people who work at the CDC this this is I'm worldly on slide two But nobody who works at the CDC understands this slide Can you believe that? Yeah, I can believe it. Okay. Now. There's something called the temporal Healthy vaccine effect and it's gone after 21 days. We've never seen it happen after 21 days I've asked these people who say all healthy vaccine effect cannot last for years and I say show me evidence of that They never do I've never seen the healthy vaccine effect happen for more than 21 days And what this this is is that they don't give the vaccine to people who are going to die tomorrow Or people who are going to die? Today after tomorrow because they're going to die and a lot of people they know that they're going to die in the next 10 days So they don't bother giving a vaccine because why would you vaccinate them? In this case people would vaccinate people who we're going to die in two days because they're afraid of catching covid From someone who's going to die in two days. So the healthy vaccine effect for covid is actually smaller It's more compressed than the normal effect, but but there is an effect. Okay, and you'll see that in the curves and The other thing you'll see in these curves is this red line here, which is Running you run out of time to die now that doesn't mean that everybody's rushing to to die before the time goes out You know, it's because the studies always ended a certain time period You have your observation time window and then you give the dose over say the first year And then you look at the second year to see what happened So after 365 days it starts going down because people simply can't live that long because the study was compressed okay, and The other thing you'll see in this is is something called 50% of the people leaving for dose three So people who got shot to a lot of these people were duped into taking shot number three half the people right so That's the you know, it's like half the people have IQs under a hundred and half Okay, so so anyway, so half the people it turns out went for dose three and So you can see that so the line if you looked at the deaths per day

[00:05:00]

It's gonna start dropping as people go and leave the cohort and so if you're just plotting desk per day It's gonna go down by 50% if half the people leave, okay? and And then I'm gonna sort slightly confuse you and talk about mortality rate mortality rate is the desperate 100k person years so it's not per day its person years and so that That curve tends to remain flat you You have that healthy vaccine effect, but then you have a flat curve and then it starts getting noisy at the end because You're running out of man days and and and deaths and it just becomes erratic. Okay, so Any questions? Okay, great. So we have no questions. So I'm gonna just move on We don't have time for questions, but we can we'll have time for questions after the talk So MIT professor Robert Langer did not want to see the data He's oh sorry MIT Institute professors This is they're only like 12 Institute professors this guy's at the top of his class He has an h index of like 317 which is completely off the charts I mean this guy is academically the smartest guy in the world or you know one of the smartest guys in the world his papers have been more You know read by more people than virtually anyone I Asked him. I said do you want to see the data that I'm going to show? Tonight that I'm gonna show all of you tonight and so I wrote him and I left my phone number And I wrote him about it Maybe half a dozen times and I left phone calls and the students visited his lab to make sure he knew about it He did not respond Now do you know why he didn't respond? He had COVID no no If he sees the data he has a duty as a board member of Moderna to immediately stop to shots That's why these people That's why these people will not cannot Under any circumstances ever see what I'm about to show you today If you were to walk up to them and show them the data they would like run the other way or call the cops on you Okay, they are not allowed to see this data because if they did they'd have a fiduciary Responsibility to stop the shots. Well more it's actually criminal liability is the more is the more important thing He could be held criminally liable if they don't stop the shots once he knows that they're killing people So this is why? None of these people ever want to see the data that I'm showing you this will never be shown at the CDC or FDA This will never appear in the New York Times. This will never appear on any media No media will cover this because otherwise they're gonna have to stop the shots So it's just you people in the room and a couple of people watching on the live stream Now remember the prep act only protects you from civil liability not Criminal liability. This is why they can't afford to see any of this data that I'm showing you tonight now They basically have to act if they know if they're their kill shots, so Moderna and Pfizer were asked by a prominent medical Journalist if they wanted to see the data and they said no we don't want to see any of the data That's the way it works now. Does anybody want to take their place in Defending the vaccine tonight. I asked this earlier didn't get any volunteers anybody Okay, seeing seeing none. I'm gonna move on What we have a guy are you serious? You would oh You would okay, so okay, well, I'm not great great Okay, so I'm gonna have you come up here after I'm gonna do my presentation and then you're not you can explain it to us Okay, okay, all right, so I'm gonna show you some some Data from Medicare Medicare is the gold standard data and I'm gonna show you this data that has never before been made public And it's the same time period for all these graphs We're looking at the same time period the same population the only thing that's different is the vaccine Okay, that's kind of the control group Okay, this is a pneumococcal vaccine This is your typical unsafe vaccine. I have never met a vaccine that was safe I'm still looking so pneumococcal. No, no, no Safe vaccine and the reason is that little dot up there over my head Where on day zero it kills a ton of people this may look like a small number But this is basically a ton of people this means it is a very unsafe vaccine

[00:10:00]

a safe vaccine is only supposed to kill Somewhere on the order one person per million shots This thing you can clearly see on day zero is killing a ton of people and in fact The flu shots do the same thing and You know so when we talk about there's a lot of seasonal death in the elderly I Wonder if it's the flu shots causing the seasonal death in the elderly Nobody ever looks at that and I did a calculation and there are actually more people who die From the flu shot itself then who died from the flu? They the vaccine is killing more people than the disease so Anyway, this is pneumococcal it falls 11% over 365 days you can see it's a straight line It's just like I taught you in the earlier lecture. See what I what I teach you is actually happens in practice It's even a Poisson distribution 6 6 0 4 1 right So these dots have that have a fine effectively this noise So if you look at the standard deviation and calculate standard deviation You'll find that it's the same as a Poisson distribution because the Poisson distribution the variance is equal to the mean You all knew that right? Okay, good. How do you people knew that? Okay, good. Okay. Awesome. Okay, so now this vaccine is a very unsafe vaccine The slope goes up monotonically for 365 days straight This is unprecedented I have a leaker in HHS who has never seen anything like this before in her life and she does this every single day This is like if I were to drop this it would go up It's not supposed to happen What this means is that it means the vaccines are killing people they're not helping people They are killing people all you need is this one chart. You don't need a control group You don't need to adjust for confounders. You don't need any of that stuff This one chart is the death shot for this vaccine and it has all been in plain sight in Medicare since the beginning of the vaccination program It's just that nobody wants to look at the Medicare data and the CDC hides it from site Going up 26% instead of going down by at least 5% or more for the Medicare audience is a net difference of a 31% over one year period that is astronomical This is this is a killing machine that should be stopped immediately and they've had the data the whole time This is Medicare this is the population that was supposed to be protected By the shots and instead the shots are killing people It there is no doubt about this It didn't save anyone it killed people No doubt about it. None whatsoever It should be labeled generally regarded as unsafe GR AU that acronym doesn't even exist for vaccines Because they're always safe even though they're not but these things should be the COVID vaccines especially, but the other vaccines as well should be grow generally regarded as unsafe and Harvey rich said well I'd like to see the other shots as well and so Harvey Harvey rich is a famous epidemiologist one of the top epidemiologists in the United States As well as the world and so I showed in the choice. He says, okay, I'm convinced So this just shows this was not a fluke This happens on dose one dose two and dose three and I don't have that data for dose four It goes up WTF what the crap It goes up. It's supposed to slope down Goes up and I wrote this I Found this out back February 25th, 2023. I wrote an article I said game over Medicare data shows the COVID vaccines increase your risk of dying I mean, this is like not new news February what are we you now? I mean, it's almost like a year later These people don't read my sub stack, you know My sub stack is if you try to click on my sub stack If you work at the CDC and you try to click over on my sub stack It says this this web page is regarded as unsafe I'm not kidding So do you know why they never spotted any of these safety signals?

[00:15:00]

Because yeah, I mean well, you know, they're looking for for something that kills you immediately, right? Because most of these vaccines they kill you immediately. You know, I like these pneumococcal, right? They it kills you immediately and then slow both down so they're looking for did it kill you in the first week or two weeks? No, must be safe They're looking for that Joe Latipo in Florida did this self-control case study case series He's looking comparing the deaths like in the first like I don't know if it was a 30 days or whatever versus the next 30 days And he's saying oh, you know if it really works It's gonna be lower than the in the first 30 days and he found it was and so he said wow this thing is safe. No Joe Slope goes the wrong way That's the way the slow goes. It's just killing people in a way that we have never seen before unprecedented way that's why they they're looking for this and that's why they never found this Okay, and I made security is this because I did something called a ratio analysis and I was confused because Man these people I I looked at how they were dying and I said well if it's unsafe vaccine Then if if I look at the time to die for anyone if they died a certain day I want to find out like where in the the dates that they could die Did they fall or fit it were more than half of them dying in the first half versus the second half of the the time period left to die Little hard to explain here, but basically it was like it was weird I was I was seeing that while these vaccines look safe And so even I was fooled because I didn't realize that the curve was Weighted such that you're dying six months to a year after you got the shot and that's how it killed people So even I was fooled now. This is the most damaging Medicare curve I have seen so far now these are people who got exactly two shots not three shots not four shots they got exactly two shots and And so the reason why this is so So deadly is Because what happens is remember I taught you earlier in our course I said, you know if you abandon if 50 percent abandoned for the next dose the thing's gonna go down That's gonna drop to 50 percent. So you can see this baseline level Here baseline to that is at 200 deaths per day So that means because 50 percent left that means the baseline original baselines 400 Okay, you just double 200 because you have twice so many people and look All those things they're above the baseline from like, you know, it starts above the baseline and keeps going higher and higher and higher There's no doubt once again confirming it and of course my favorite is the anecdotes and And you know that scientists always say oh anecdotes the plural of of anecdote is anecdotes and it's not data Bullshit, okay in a world where information is being withheld or distorted anecdotes are often the best source of truth Let me give you an example Jay Bonner 57 year old high tech executive 15 friends died unexpectedly post facts all the dead were vaxed prior to the vax rollout Jay had one unexpected death in over 30 years and Four of the 15 people who died died within 24 hours of a vaccine and three of the four were under 30 Within 24 hours of the vaccine like hello Now let's do the your plus on survival function on Essentially it's 14 because it's of the way the person survival function works So it's 14 comma like point one so expecting point one in a period and you got 14, which is seven Times 10 to the minus 28 Which means this is not something that we didn't get just get unlucky here Okay, there's something going on the vaccine killed his friends Guaranteed that's the only way this can happen Now the other thing is that 15 of his friends died from the vaccine and zero is friends died from covid But covid is supposed to kill way more than the vaccine. I mean the vaccine is supposed to be around here compared to the you know Covid well, he's got there. He's got the reverse Well, okay, but so you can do this serve the plus on a cumulative distribution function and you know essentially look at it The other way essentially you were expecting at least 15 covid deaths That he should have gotten to match and he got zero where the chances of that pretty small So essentially what this tells us is

[00:20:00]

Mathematically from just this one anecdote There's no way that It couldn't be anything less than the cure was far worse than the disease Okay, this vaccine was far worse Than covid it created us it didn't save anyone and you know The thing is that I always trust the math because the math never lies Poisson distributions never lie It's not like science Sciences, you know people can say well, you know, I think this and think that we got the theory and the changes Poisson distributions never change You know you can't can't beat that Okay, now there's this famous quote from Eric Rubin New England He's the editor-in-chief New England Journal of Medicine. He's on the FDA committee He's an adjunct professor of Immunology and infectious disease Harvard University. This guy's an expert, right? Can't get any better than this we're never going to learn about how safe the vaccines are until we start giving it I You know he said this This is not I'm like not out of context. This is legit stuff And he's right because the clinical trials are too small to find these vaccine effects that happen In smaller numbers than would be detected in these these trials. So we now have the safety data, right? And one small Problem of course is that normally in public health has ever taken ever looked at it very seriously, right? They've never released the record level data For any vaccine no country has ever done that in the entire world. No state has ever done that nobody has released the record level data So we could look at it we can look at it either because it's not there We can't they're not looking at it. They could like it but they're not and they're not releasing it to us So we can't look at it either and that's me. Oh, well I was an unhappy camper until I got this data And then I was like singing ding dong the witch is dead after I got the data So Nobody can ever figure out the ground truth about any vaccine or any pharmaceutical because they're always hiding the data and I'm the guy, you know, gone for data transparency, but nobody's listening to me. So all that changed for me on November 9th 2023 I have a wasabi server and somebody uploaded the data to my wasabi server in the cloud and It was a whistleblower in New Zealand. He's he works for the Ministry of Health And I know his name I'm one of the very few people in the world. He has revealed his identity to He uploaded the data I know that I know he's legit I know he works at the Ministry of Health and I know that data is legit because I examined the individual data records themselves to verify That the data is legit and I ran a whole series of statistical tests on the data and the data is legit This was also released just a day earlier this by The people involved in this And they called it operation M O A R the mother of all revelations because this record level data has never been released by anyone ever before This is the first time in world history Where we can actually see the record level data released from a country? That is stunning and now we know why they don't release it now Would you like to see that video? It's an hour video But and it was posted to YouTube but in less than five minutes Less than five minutes YouTube Took down the video because It violated community standards the community standards say you shall not speak About the truth about the vaccine you have to lie you have to tell people it's safe and effective If you don't do that you're violating community standards and they remove your video from YouTube Even though you're trying to save lives because YouTube is not interested in saving lives They are interested in promoting a false narrative that is killing people and Anyone who works for YouTube should be ashamed of themselves and they should quit their job

[00:25:00]

And if you want to know what I really think Talk to me afterwards You can watch it on rumble Okay, and these slides all of them have hyperlinks so you can check it out These slides were posted to my sub stack at 6 p.m. When I started the talk So you can download a PDF version you can watch on Google and so forth So we now have the data we have the data that nobody was supposed to see and It's now available for anyone in the world To download from my wasabi server And not only that today only I am throwing in for free For free the data analysis tools that you need to be able to analyze this for yourself in Five minutes so you don't have to take my word for it because I'm just a misinformation super spreader You can do it yourself you get the original data which we have obfuscated so that we don't get into trouble Right, it's all HIPAA compliant But we preserved all of the fidelity of the data so that we have shifted things such that the statistics are identical even though No record matches anything about any of the people in it so we preserve privacy But we also expose the truth Okay, so this is record level data and that means there's an individual record for every person it's official government data This is gold standard data. This is ground zero data and the Ministry of Truth. Oh, sorry the Ministry of Health New Zealand Cannot say that this is fraudulent data or that this is not the data from their database If they do that they will be digging themselves into a hole which will lead to criminal prosecution of the people that lie about this This is not something they are going to be able to tell a fact checker and claim that this was not real data And it doesn't get any better than this I Told you revenge of the nerd You don't want to mess with an MIT electrical engineering Master of science degree You know This is what it's MIT is all about is to enable people like me Who are critical thinkers to go and use the skills that I learned at MIT 604 one I had algebraic as my my teacher and actually apply those skills to solving real world problems and So for a professional misinformation spreader such as myself this data is the Rosetta stone It unlocked all the mysteries. I thought maybe the Medicare data was confounded somehow I mean it's like well all these people are telling me it's safe and effective and I'm crazy and all this nope. I'm not at all I we can statistically prove now whether a vaccine is is safe or not from record level data and The results are objective and easy to interpret the slope go up Or to go down it's really easy up or down. It's not that complicated Now have you ever wondered why it's always kept hidden right it's Basically that New Zealand record level data shows about the COVID vaccine. It's not pretty you know 13 million people have been killed worldwide That's what it shows 13 million people were killed worldwide By the COVID vaccines who are the perpetrators who is the governments? You know president Biden He's got 75,000 Americans blood on his hands and They did it for no benefit It wasn't like it saved any lives either didn't save any hospitalizations no benefit whatsoever with one exception It did provide immunity For the pharmaceutical companies That is the only immunity it provided is for the pharma companies The shots mean it more likely you would die if you were elderly Which is the very population that the shots were designed to protect? Now a safe vaccine as I said should have this you know flat curve that goes downwards This is actually the this is the flu shot look at that

[00:30:00]

We see the same pattern for its day zero deaths and the flu shots aren't sloping down like they should they should start to Start to sloping down on day 21 Look at those flu shots now That's that's a problem, but you know nobody looks at the flu shots. They all assume safe and effective like you know like our pneumococcal That's what it should look like except for that one little whoops not safe dot In fact if we could get rid of that one little one little dot in the pneumococcal it would actually be a safe vaccine I don't know if it works But but it's it passes the safe test it looks like a safe vaccine COVID vaccine epic fail. This is the new ceiling data. Nobody's ever seen this before This is the estimated baseline. This is what people should be normally in this cohort dying at and Look at what happens it goes up and then it goes down now. This is averaged over five doses Okay, so this is the average effect so each doses can have a different response curve We saw what the response curve was for was for dose one it went up for 12 months So this is the combined response curve from the New Zealand data Showing you what happens and it is not pretty it is killing people and at the end When we get to time 80 weeks since the shot we're starting to get into noise because we run out of data We run out of time to die essentially So then if the numerator gets become small the denominator becomes small and that creates these large errors Because zero divided by zero is either zero or it's more or its infinity so Could anything be happening in the background to explain this because this is what you know people wonder about well Maybe there's some explanation for you know things going up and up and up for 365 days monotonically Maybe there is there. There's no possible way This is with a silent F No possible way that that could be the case and I have looked at this thing I have the my dashboard. It's in the V3 spreadsheet here in the dashboard you see the dashboard the upper graphs are the independent variables y-axis of course is the dependent variable and I look at the actual mortality rates For the four different independent variables and then below I actually show the number of deaths So you can see whether you're gonna have confidence in the data above So with these eight charts, you can tell exactly what's going on this in my dashboard and then I spend hours Changing the variables I say well, let's look at those three. Let's look at those four. Let's look at under 60. Let's look at over 60 Lots of interesting stuff there. So under 60 year olds what we see flat death curve. Hey looks like a safe vaccine for under 60 It's not But we just don't have enough data to get the resolution on that and there's and and there's that the data anomaly at the very beginning because of The properties of the data that we got we only got people who are vaccinated And we only got it, you know when they got their first vaccine and so People ramped up. We didn't get a nice curve That starts on day on on a specific time So that's why we have that that data strangeness there and then 80 to 90 year olds you can see this the slope goes up Okay, so if you're elderly you don't want to get these shots and If you're a young person you don't want to get the shots either Because we just don't have enough resolution to show you just because we don't have enough young people dying But it shows as a control group because it says that we got the right calculation Because we're getting a constant death rate right for the young because the young are less affected by this this vaccine The vaccine primarily kills elder people and that's why we got this constant Right, so we have confidence this gives us confidence in our tools that the tools worked and also the data Is is correct that there's nothing wrong, you know, we would have seen something weird if If any of these things were broken, so it's it's another quality control thing that you can look at and so there are artifacts and We talked about that So here's the killer Everybody says oh Steve you're a misinformation Spreader and you're an engineer and you're not a doctor and you don't know statistics Okay, all right, we know whatever So here's a guy who knows statistics this guy is the worst enemy For the health authorities this guy Norman Fenton is professor of statistics and Information risk and information management in Queens Mary University of London and He is the only guy in the world who discovered that the UK data was bogus

[00:35:00]

and And he wrote a letter to the the UK office of national statistics saying you're wrong your stats are wrong and they said you're right so this guy is the biggest enemy of the state because he's a true teller and he understands math there you go and And it was acknowledged by the onus nobody else in the world has those credentials So this guy is the top dog and he said there is now No doubt the vaccine is increasing the mortality rate of older people The very population it was meant to serve so you don't have to take my word for it anymore folks Norman Fenton has said it and Nobody can challenge that guy Nobody in the world. That's all right. Nobody will debate him even better Harvey Rich Harvey Rich has an h index of 110 There are very few people in the world with an h index of over or anywhere close to 110 This what this means is that you have published 110 papers that have 110 Citations or more this is asymptotically harder and harder to achieve as the numbers go up it's easy to achieve an h index of six or seven and You know like what I have it's very hard to get into the hundreds very few people in the world ever get into the hundreds And if he writ if he wrote on more popular subjects His h index would be even higher this guy is one of the top epidemiologists in the world And he's also one of the top epidemiologists of course in the United States And what he said in way too many words because this is how they talk You know if there was a mass shooting And everybody died the epidemiologists would say well, let's look at confounders and We had to have the medical history of everybody who died and you know, let's run some analysis Cox Regression, you know survival analysis hazard ratio analysis on these people and you know We can't really say for sure whether they were killed by the the gunman, you know, I mean this is how they talk okay? what he said is You've made a very strong case in other words your case is airtight on the translate for you He says appreciably increase mortality rates, okay What he means is mortality rates are off the charts, but I have to say after tone it down and Then he says I would not aware of actual evidence that the increased mortality that you've been shown has a different cause in that In other words, it's a slam dunk. It was the vaccine, but I just can't say that okay. This is this is I hope that translation was helpful From science to you know what they really mean because that's that's the way it goes He has to talk in funny language like that Because otherwise his peers say no you can't say that okay, so The question is by how much and so we can we can now use this New Zealand data to make that calculation And when I did that I found about on average for all the doses 216 excess Desper 100k person years and if you assume that there are normally two doses of vaccine per year Because everybody's you know upping getting it every six months. This is a crude estimate, okay, so It turns out that if you do that and you realize two doses per person year and do the math The answer is one excess death per 1,000 doses So if there were 675 million doses given in the US that means 675,000 people died in the US if there are 13 billion doses given worldwide It means 13 million people died worldwide and they were killed by the vaccine. I see we lost our MIT students start Yep gotta go okay Yeah Yeah, okay, we Okay, great we talk lighter okay the The killed estimate 13 million people worldwide 675,000 Americans Ethical skeptic looked at survey data Estimate 1.39 million excess deaths in the US far larger Than I so he used a different method and the same thing of course is happening in other countries

[00:40:00]

Denis Rancourt estimated not 13 million people died by 17 million people died So he's getting the same numbers. We're basically in the same ballpark. We're basically kind of rearranging deck chairs on Titanic The UK ONS data if you look at that the AC the all-cause mortality significantly higher in the vaccinated for 20 consecutive months Pretty stunning. This is this data has been out there and If you if you plot it, you'll see that look look at that upward slope Upward slope over time so as people are getting these vaccines. They're dying at a higher and higher rate over time Isn't that stunning UK ONS has never plotted this somebody? Who basically thinks I'm wrong sent this to me and I said great I'm gonna be using this slide in my presentation because it shows the upward slope and it gets slows upward and then it slows Slows down work just like you saw in the New Zealand data and look what happened in the Philippines That's deaths were five times the COVID does Okay, and the Philippines access desk skyrocket right after the vaccine went out There was nothing nor no access desk prior to the vaccine and look what happened to the Philippines They have an investigation going now and this is from from my friend Ben at US mortality and he wrote on Twitter. It's as clear as it gets Flat line in terms of excess deaths. They roll out the vaccine and voila Man it just peeks right up there, doesn't it? And of course I did some surveys Of my readers and found that the vaccine killed three and a half times more Americans than the COVID virus So this is all consistent with the data you've seen before you can do your own surveys on Twitter Sounds too hard to believe But you know this is the result of the survey that I did and the thing about my followers is Is that they're pretty much unvaccinated and their families are unvaccinated too So this is their vaccinated And this was asking about a lost family member due to COVID or the vaccines and these people are under vaccinated Right because they're my followers. They don't believe in vaccines So they're under vaccinated and yet look at the numbers and they have no incentive to lie on this Here's the United States Medicare. We saw this before slop upwards. This is them all deves. I have record But record level data from the Maldives same thing climbs up after you give the shot Climes up. Oh and this is my favorite is Rayleigh data. This is from the Israeli Ministry of Health So let's look at the baseline calculation for Israel. How many people die in Israel a day? It's it's 28.4 people died per day In Israel this is I asked bard because I wanted to have a neutral source and bard is is very What we call bluepilled bard thinks the vaccines are safe. Okay, so if you do a bard query, it'll say you know In about the vaccine and here are the the results break down in terms of The age group. So 65 plus those are the people who are more likely to die. It's 83.7 percent, but that's as of 2023 So we're gonna We're gonna take it by 83 percent 28.4 deaths was is basically around a estimate of 23.5 deaths per day That's what the red line represents. Look what happens In the first 60 days in Israel. This is record level data from Israel summarized by the Israeli Ministry of Health This has been publicly available for a long time on the internet Look what happens to the death count in Israel And look what happens in the first seven months After dose two is given the peak is 3.8 times from the baseline and nobody notices except for me This has been in public views since March 7th at 2023 when mit professor red zeph levy posted it on twitter Nobody cares how many people the vaccine kills or injures the medical community Does whatever they're told to do They are incapable of independent thought and this is proof of it It does not matter how many people die if the medical community is told by the cdc that the vaccines are safe The vaccines are safe and it doesn't matter how many people have to die The vaccines are safe and they will continue to recommend them. Otherwise, they will be stripped of their licenses They don't want to lose their job And they don't want to lose their board certifications And so they remain silent while the killing happens and even the whistle blowers You know, I get these messages saying so and so yeah, they're seeing all this stuff But they they don't want to go on record because they need their job So they're they're keeping their mouth shut Dr. Peter mccolland didn't keep his mouth shut

[00:45:00]

He's one of my heroes He's one of the top cardiologists in the world and he just had his board certification revoked For saying that the covid vaccines are killing people He had his board certification revoked because he told the truth Here's the letter Telling him his unless unless he wins his appeal his board certification so he can practice medicine Is revoked? Because he has been saying the truth That's why people don't speak out Here's another courageous this us-native medical officer spoke out heart failure is up by 973 percent in the military That is That's a train wreck. I mean the words cannot describe this So they tell their superiors and the superior says okay, you know no problem. You know, it's We'll continue to give the shots They don't change they do whatever they're told it doesn't matter how many people need to die now if this This is the there are two figures here once the top showing and what actually happened Okay, the other figure below it is what was supposed to happen if the vaccines worked See the difference big difference the debates over I'm gonna I guess we can just just check in here to see how we're doing on the polls Because we we asked if the the covid vaccines are safe and we we if you If you voted Before and you want to change your vote you can do so now The polls are open and I'm gonna flip over here and see how we're doing maybe some people I've convinced people the vaccines are safe So let's present here And it looks like we we got some people on our side, but We got 3% leaning safe now in an interesting Oh, oh people are changing. Oh Okay, so we're moving we're we're still got some some stragglers there. Okay, so I'm gonna flip off of this Let's go back and I'm doing my best I'm trying to show the data. Maybe they're waiting to download the data so they can see it themselves Okay, so My opposition doesn't want to talk about it at all that you know the $10 million offers to get them to show up here You know Langer was offered 10 million. I don't hate 10 million to MIT Wouldn't show up for that. You know why he could have any could have named a team of people To have appear in his place Instead he chose to ignore it and he didn't even give me the courtesy of a response I went to Moderna I went to the because I'm in the press. I'm a journalist so I contacted the press liaison I left a message on her cell phone. I know who she is I left many messages on her cell phone saying hey Um, do you want to defend your vaccine? And the answer was Nothing no response just as you expected You know what these are crickets. That's what I got 100k reward. I Even offered any scientist in the world 100k to come here and if you if you convinced people you're right you know in 100k Nobody wanted to challenge me live And I and I even opened it up to the anti anti-vaxxers So these are the people who say that I'm wrong And I said if any of you want to come here and challenge me live I'm opening up the offer to them and none of them wanted to reply And so I wrote Pierre Cori a message saying it's so expensive to find someone to debate you nowadays Isn't it and he wrote back agreed Isn't that stunning Now if the CDC was was honest here are the ads that they should be running COVID-19 vaccines increase her risk for infection serious disease and death we made a mistake. We shouldn't have recommended it People got the shot. Sorry about that Where is the apologies and it should say all vaccines are unsafe and Andrew Wakefield was right And I hope I will live long enough to see this ad being promoted by the cvc. I may have to live to a thousand years old

[00:50:00]

Before I see that Okay, so The the New Zealand data is 4 million records 33 percent of all vaccine records in New Zealand there are 20 12 million vaccine records It's vaccinated people only dead or alive So anybody who got a vaccine If they they died is recorded if they're living And I personally authenticated all this and even the most and this is this is my favorite even the most vocal supporters of the vaccine Concede that the New Zealand data is highly accurate. So here it is folks the real truther It doesn't get any better than this the real truther my sort of my arch nemesis that if I go into his room I can't even get a word in edgewise. He's like, well, what about Sweden? Let's talk about Sweden, you know And he will not let you talk but Iconum in a tweet. He said New Zealand tracked data very accurately with a capital vey So This guy is basically saying the data is legit There's nothing better than this. This is from the guy who's promoting the vaccine He's admitting the New Zealand data is they tracked it very accurately You don't get any better than this folks. This is as good as it gets Now just what the headlines are saying New Zealand records biggest increase in registered deaths in 100 years alarming acceleration in New Zealand excess deaths latest official figures up 70 percent On last year. Does that sound like a safe vaccine? 60 year olds fail. This is the New Zealand data over time death rate over time Um for dose two dose three and dose four we have less info on dose four For seven year olds dose two dose three dose four For 80 year olds dose two dose three dose four For 90 year olds dose two dose three dose four For all ages dose two dose three dose four The curse should be flat Does anybody think those curves are flat? Okay Because if you Did think the circles are flat There was a job for you and the CDC in the safety department They are looking for people just like you if you thought they were flat And then we have our sanity check where we looked at calendar months and it's it's a flat line for um For people under 60 So what was it caused by the vaccine, you know, because they always say oh, it's a confounder and we have to look at You know 60 different variables. We have to look at the ages We have to look at whether they have diabetes. We have to look at whether they have heart disease No, you don't need to do any of that. There's no other viable alternative. It meets off Brought for till criteria. Nothing else could cause such a change here the five Brought for till criteria And it meets the consistency strength of association specificity temporal relation and Biologic plausibility in other words, is it plausible that we could massively increase the death rate if we injected you with a poison? The answer is yes that could that could do it That can massively increase it over time. I mean, you know, that's what it's about big picture massive increase in all-cause mortality Um, this is uh, rubber Malone the He's credited as inventing the technology Behind these m r a vaccines and he has been a vocal critic of these vaccines Even though he is Has patents on the underlying technology and he says basically it's not 14 million lives saved Like they projected but over 17 million dead from the m rn a colvin vaccine Um another Twitter quote. I'm gonna skip go faster because i'm I'm getting short of time Uh, this is from ed doubt. Here's a here's a graph and these are of malignant neoplasm of the breasts In other words cancer the breast cancer the brain blah blah blah and you can see how these things are going up dramatically after the vaccine rollout And Embalmers it's totally upside down embalmers used to rarely see clots. It was like 10 or 15 percent Now they rarely see someone without a clot Who dies? It's the other way around it's like 80 percent have clots the world has turned upside down And the CDC of course will say that there's no evidence of harm Because they refuse to investigate or view any of this these adverse event data that is found by These people and there are so there the bottom line is the fourth action needs to know about the cove vaccine It increases your risk of infection It will not do anything to your risk of hospitalization from covet It is complete. It's it's a zero on that

[00:55:00]

It will increase your risk of death from covet and it will also increase your risk of death from all cause mortality Who would take a shot like this? There's probably there's one person in the audience who would but um Most people shouldn't Nobody should be getting any of these shots. Nobody. There's no like kids aren't dying Now here's the thing why aren't me be told told this it's a it's a systemic defect The CDC does not have the record level data So they don't get the vaccination records coming in from the states So they cannot do a Cohort time series analysis like I did Because they don't know when people were vaccinated all they know is when people died They don't know the dates when individual people die and and are um and when those people who died were vaccinated The CDC cannot do the analysis They don't have the data and they don't want to ask for the data either Because if they ask for the data then I could foyer it and I would know So the CDC basically says nope, we don't want to know But it's the vaccine is safe. Trust us And so the states now the states have the record level data But they don't do the analysis because why should they the CDC says it's safe So they got the records, but they don't look at them It's a catch 22 Nobody nobody basically analyzes the data It's all you know this this systemic defect So infection we have a Paper from the Cleveland Clinic, which is one of the top Places in the world medical Organizations in the world and it shows that If the more recently you got a vaccine the worse off you are You are better to be under vaccinated to protect you from covid and in fact there's another chart That shows that Every time you get a vaccine it increases your risk of getting covid And that's in the peer reviewed published in the peer reviewed literature Was not revoked was not Retracted, thank you Here's another paper. This is in jama. This is my favorite paper It's my favorite paper one of my probably my favorite paper all the time. It's a research letter April 6th, 2023 comes from a top epidemiologist inside the va And This guy is an h index of like 77. I mean he's uh this guy's a smart guy And he's he's doing his study and he's showing hey, let's look at the i'm gonna do I'm gonna look at people hospitalized for covid versus people hospitalized from the flu and i'm gonna compare Um these groups and i'm going to see how they do in terms of death So they said this is my baseline and so he looked at the baseline characteristics of people who are admitted to the hospital for flu And people who are admitted to the hospital for covid and he says look these cohorts are very very similar their ages are similar their comorbidities are similar and look Even their vaccinations status is similar Very similar groups. So now let me do the experiment now that i've shown you that my groups are very similar You see the problem here The groups aren't supposed to be similar if you got hospitalized for covid versus the vax So if the flu and the covid vaccines protected against hospitalization, you should see a dramatic difference between the groups This is what it should look like and i'm making these numbers up But the point is there should be this dramatic difference between the cohorts and there isn't There isn't which means that the flu vaccine doesn't protect against infection or hospitalization Zero benefit and it also means the covid vaccines don't protect against infection and hospitalization It's a net zero impact. It's for dose one dose two dose three dose four whatever it is zero impact In fact the smallest impact was for the if they got a recent booster zero So um and When you look at in practice The protection against death is less than the net protection from hospitalization It's always true that the biggest the biggest effect are the protection from infection and then it's a smaller amount for hospitalization and then even a smaller amount for death So when the net benefit of the first two or zero There's no room For a benefit. It says to be smaller than zero. The only thing smaller than zero is zero So this one paper Basically proves that there's no benefit from the covid vaccine or the flu vaccine And it's gold standard data from the VA So I asked the author I said you should publish this as another research note to say hey I missed this sorry about that, but the flu vaccines and covid vaccines don't work

[01:00:00]

He said he didn't have time to write it up He didn't have time to write up nice guy, but he didn't have time to write it up. Isn't that amazing? Isn't that astonishing? Most astonishing thing I've seen and then of course there's death death from covid. So We can't tell From this day because it's all caused mortality data whether this thing actually makes you less likely to die from covid There might have been a benefit Uh, but we have the us nursing home data and it shows that the covid vaccine had no difference at all In terms of your if you got covid um Your risk of dying from covid now the orange line here Is basically the death curve and i've magnified it. It's on the right hand axis So you can see how it is relative to the infections and you actually see how it changes So in the first first the left hand part of the graph the pre omicron you're seeing that the orange lines are like above the um the infection line and and the scales are the same Throughout the whole thing. Okay, but as soon as almicron hits look the orange lines are like a tenth or you know Uh, you know 20% of the of the Of the infection line, which means that your risk of dying went way down But it wasn't the vaccine that caused it It was almicron It was the variant that caused the change and you can see this also with an odds ratio calculation and Basically you hit the vaccine rollout and that orange line is supposed to go down And it goes up And people like don't like to talk about this data because it goes the wrong way And as an example apple valley village health care center They saw seven times higher covid death rates after the covid vaccine was rolled out It was supposed to go the other way and of course nobody who currently works at apple valley village would talk to me on the record about this All cosmortality gold standard time series the cohort analysis. This is what we did. We looked at um, we put people on buckets They got Um, so this is an example of the record here and we put them in in in buckets of of man weeks from the the time of the dose and so forth is not uh too complicated but Long I don't have enough time to explain it here But basically they're four independent variables and one dependent variable you analyze it and you look at it This is what the graph should look like they should look pretty much straight lines And and of course your morbidity goes Your mortality rate goes up with age But they basically should be straight lines because these are mortality rates. So these are in deaths per 100 1,000 person years should be straight line Okay, so record level data courses Uh, it's simply the year of birth the date of death if they're dead in the vaccination history That's what record level data is looks like this very simple and it's the key and we can instantly tell this is why it's never Revealed We see the only explanation You know is that the vaccines are killing people and at this point we're rearranging deck chairs And then take anything to say well, did it kill, you know, like 1.3 people per thousand or 1.2 people who cares? It killed too many people and Um, was there a benefit? No, there was no benefit um at all that we could see um so and I'm of course pushing for a disclosure of of this information this record level data Uh, and I offered all this stuff to the fda cdc Pfizer Moderna and the california department of public health And none of them wanted to see the record level data. I I advertised to any qualified epidemiologists To see it nobody wanted to see the data either um And the reason is I wanted to show the data to them so they could say oh, you know, you goofed your assigner or whatever And I was trying to be responsible before I went public with this So I tried for weeks to get anybody to look at the data Nobody wanted to take the time to explain it to me or or my colleagues how we got it all wrong They all refused my offer. They said the vaccines are safe and they don't want the record level data that they had never seen before They don't want to see it. It's kind of like um the treasure of Sierra Madre You all remember this scene from the treasure of Sierra Madres when he says when this guy says um How we are the federalists, you know the cdc You know and the guys at the the other guy I forget his his name is asking for you know, do you have any badges? He said and so the guy says data. We ain't got no data. We don't need no data I don't have to show you any stinking data, right? um kind of paraphrasing it was actually badges, but but I changed the word to data, but it's essentially We're we're the feds and we don't need to show you any stinking data

[01:05:00]

and This Kind of sums it up here In terms of our our trusted authorities. You don't have to trust me you can do your own research We now have that record level data and if you think you got it wrong, uh, let me know you can download the data here You use the wasabi export and download it. You can also use our clone and These are the access codes to be able to download it yourself and you can verify What this like I it's in the slide that gets posted it's posted overcoming objections. You can't prove the vaccines caused this you didn't control for confounders There's there's there are no confounders that can possibly explain this Uh, where they hide the bodies, you know people say, oh, you know, they're no excess where they had bodies Oh, they hit the bodies in plain sight New Zealand records make us increase in registered dozen 100 years And the uk access desk in 2022 among worst in 50 years That's where they hit the bodies folks in plain sight Okay, um and then you saw the the the new Zealand thing the us had 600 k fss in 2021 alone It's normally 2.8 million people who die 3.4 million who died in 2021 and sick of that that most of these deaths were vaccine related uh, um John badwin who's who's who's here? John? John? Didn't have access to vaccination data all he got was mortality data He got the death records in massachusetts and he found that 4,000 excess deaths were caused by the vaccines 4,000 deaths caused by the vaccines and he didn't even have the vaccination data to do that That is heroic work now If the vaccines were safe, he should have found fewer than 15 deaths He found 266 times higher than the safe expectations And here is the URL you should go check out his article He spent a lot of work on those slides and he deserves your support and he also has a link to the book on that page, right? Right Yep real real Thanks, Steve. Um, the book is the real cdc.com. It will be maybe three weeks. It's in layout right now But pre-order I'm supposed to get the website up and running like now. So Hopefully it's running if not try it tomorrow. Thanks And John is also doing something can I talk about what you're doing with the cdc The legal process and all that Yeah, okay, so he's also sending a little memo to the cdc saying guys I'm putting you on legal notice that this is happening and these deaths are happening And And the and the subtext that he doesn't say is and if you ignore this and do nothing you're going to jail Here are the 20 most vaccinated countries. Here's the what happened to excess mortality in all these countries I'm not going to show you all of them, but you get the idea This is the various data. Do you see a problem? This is when the vaccines rolled out Do you see a problem? Nobody who works at the cdc can see a problem with this. They think this is normal Can you believe that? I mean these people are brain dead They you know they hire blind people to work at the cdc looking at the various data I was kidding about that, but it seems like it Okay, uh, western Australia These are the essentially the various report and the the various reporting rate in australia the equivalent of theirs Medical examiners willful blindness This is by peter mccolland md. We talked about him before He's he found that 73.9 You know essentially 74 of the deaths following vaccination We're due to the covid vaccine, but all of these were labeled as you know, just normal deaths by the the medical examiners 100,000 people 100 that sorry 10,000 died suddenly events and pull in full public view Since the vaccine program started virtually all are in the invaccinated. This is unprecedented in ed. Now's book cause unknown There were only we they have only found one person Who was unvaccinated in the 500 people who died unexpectedly?

[01:10:00]

What about that? Do you not understand? Or the bursant never happened. This is a tweet from um someone that and this resonated with a lot of people it got 128,000 views And the person wrote I do not know one person who has had a clear and normal pregnancy Since they took the covid vaccines either a miscarriage still birth or early birth I mean To even have anybody say that Is a disaster and to have this Resonate With the public where they say yeah, yeah me too me too me too me too You can go and reference this tweet and you will see how many me twos there are There are a lot of them and of course this I love love this one clearly baffling right right That eddowed wrote at the top clearly baffling us infant mortality rate rises for the first time in more than 20 years Clearly baffling can't figure it out But people are now seeing the evidence for themselves people are waking up This person wrote He is doubly vaxxed he's you know he he believed in it and he says I had never heard about so many working adults sick in my life Okay, next objection if this is really true Why aren't any of the MIT professors speaking out right because surely MIT professors are smart and they know everything that was in the slide deck And they would be speaking out. Well some are let's MIT professor at so fluffy Others choose to remain silent And so is that how science is supposed to work Is is Doctor is professor robert lyinger the new role model For how scientists are supposed to operate in the United States of America that duck you duck and run for cover when you are challenged Is that the new standard is MIT institute professor Langers running from this data is that the model? That we want to have for MIT students for this is how you deal with adverse data This is how you deal with truth you run from it You make sure that you don't show up and talk about it and defend it You know so how many people want to see a real debate on this data You know You know or or do you prefer that we censor one side of it so that you only hear from one side like like when you turn on CNN and you only hear one side of the story You know It's they these people say oh yeah, we want the debate to happen, but it should have in this scientific literature I hate that because it takes years like autism for example 20 years For 20 years it's been an ongoing question. It's not to it's a vaccines cause autism I look at the data and course it does there's no question. I would bet my life on it that vaccines cause autism How has that worked out that we resolve this in the scientific literature For 20 years have been papers on both sides claiming yes, yes, there's an effect. No, there's not for 20 years And that's the way these so-called scientists Want to resolve ambiguity they want to do it in the literature will take 20 years or maybe never That's how they want this to be resolved and we want it to happen now in a real-time dialogue Okay, and then there's the objection. Well, if that's true, how come I don't know anyone who died from the vaccine? You probably did but you just didn't realize it like if you're an MIT I Pologosse was a roommate In B entry I was in B entry McGregor 19 in the class of 78 Paul was one of my roommates in B entry and he died And you know what he died six months right after he got his first first first vaccine shot Exactly on schedule Exactly as predicted he died in his own swimming pool And they never made that public people don't die in their own swimming pool that doesn't happen Pologosse was full of life. He didn't deserve what happened to him, but nobody wants to talk about it There's another very young guy 29 Peter Badu I'm not sure if I'm pronouncing it correctly. He died unexpectedly Nobody knows why

[01:15:00]

There's a survey that was done Do you know someone this is done by raspies and when they're one of the finest polling companies in america They're willing to ask the questions that nobody else wants to ask You know someone personally who died from side effects of the coldid 19 vaccine 24% said yes This is they're asking americans This is not they're not asking anti-boxers They're asking americans 24% knew someone who died from the vaccine that is unprecedented Data transparency is key to reform All we need is one place a state or a country or Or we cut it or we cut it like the president Who believes in data transparency and who will fix the problems With the corruption of the cesian of dia We will instantly reduce sids autism autoimmune diseases heart disease food allergies doctor visits and more Do you know that um if you look at overnight autism where the kid is normal one day and just becomes autistic instantly In a 24-hour period goes from normal to autistic severely autistic in 24 hours There are no cases that happen two weeks prior to a scheduled vaccine visits And I talked with pediatrician.com said he had 44 cases Happening two weeks after the scheduled vaccine visit if it's not related to the vaccine explain that And this will be repeated everywhere Sids same deal 50% happened within 40 hours of the vaccine If that's not causal, I don't know what is It's in the Omaha police department records. I tried to foyer the information the guy said no It's not there. I said yes, it is and let me have you talk to the the detective who knows it's there He talked that a detective who told me about this and then he ghosted me They did not comply with a foyer request Because they know it's right and they know what it would expose the link between sids and autism And they don't want anyone to know Because if people knew they would be furious So they keep it hidden And they don't comply with the foyer request In 2009 congress decided it was better if the NIH did not do a study Comparing the fully unvaccinated with the fully vaccinated to look at health outcomes Congress said the American people do not want to know If the unvaccinated or healthier or not healthier than the vaccinated we prefer not to know That and so HR 3069 in 2009 was killed in committee They basically don't want you to know Either they are corrupt Every single paper in the peer reviewed literature Peer reviewed scientific literature that compares the fully vaccinated with the fully unvaccinated Always shows the unvaccinated or healthier. There are no exceptions And there's a great book new book by a guy named robert f Kennedy And brian hooker That documents all this that everyone should get There is also a large pediatric practice In the united states they've been in business for over 25 years. They have no autism They have no ADHD the kids never get sick The secret Are they avoid all vaccines? They avoid the use of tylenol if you have a fever and a few other things Now they have to be hidden. I can't even tell you who they are I know who they are But I can't tell you their names Because they would lose their license to practice medicine For going against the medical consensus Heart disease it doesn't affect The fully unvaccinated This is a comparison of heart disease for the fully unvaccinated. It's zero Versus 48 percent of americans on average and I checked the references on this Your cardiologist simply forgot to tell you this Bottom line refuse all vaccines until there is data transparency So now the question is how are they going to respond to this presentation

[01:20:00]

They'll probably ignore it Okay, be silenced. Okay, if they are forced to they will say we do not respond to external analyses Period end of story. Thank you very much. Fact checker says you know you're wrong Or It isn't published in a peer-reviewed journal. We don't have to respond to it. You can't make us look you can't make us look You know, um And if it does get published what happens is the paper magically gets retracted they'll find a reason to retract it Guaranteed that's how science works nowadays Or They'll say hey And the cc loves to do this the vaccines are safe. We've given billions of doses and nobody has died you can trust us And the fine print says even though we've never done the proper autopsy is on anything I expect this And we never did the times there's coherent analysis ourselves on the record level data. So we don't actually really know If the vaccines are safe or not to be perfectly honest But they don't that's in the fine print The part in yellow is in the fine print you just see the part in white Got it. So final thoughts hiding public health data always leads to worse health outcomes So why are we doing it? Stop hiding the data set the data free that you know if you got one thing from this president from this presentation Stop hiding the data set the data free We want to see the data and we want to see it now um This slide deck is posted on my sub stack And I want to thank you to all of the paid subscribers. I have my sub stack Because you enable me to do this work otherwise I have to get a real job doing something and not speak out about the vaccine So it is I am so grateful to the Many people who support me at five dollars a month It does your contribution makes a huge difference and enables me to fund my work and the work of other people And I fund multiple people and organizations to get this workout. You can contact me On twitter. I'm st. Kirsch on or sorry. It's x now uh st. Kirsch on on x and there's a on the pinned tweet It's uh, it shows how to contact me and there's even a proposed community note On that. I mean they're really trying to like mr. Kirsch is a mister known misinformation spreader and it doesn't say that and the you know um and uh Or you can subscribe to my sub stack at curse sub stack calm And uh, that is the last slide. So thank you very much [standing ovation] Thank you Thank you. Thank you so much. So uh, we have time for questions, right We got that we have to room till nine so Okay, all right, yeah, go ahead This will be fine.

[01:23:56] [Q&A Starts] [Dr. Randy Bock]

So so thank you. My name is uh dr. Randy bock I'm the author of "Overturning Zika", which was the last pandemic the pandemic the never was so I I'm a skeptic kind of guy And you should look into that. It's very easy to find amazon so A lot of stuff that people think happened with zika causing microcephaly. It was a big bruha It was a big huge biggest pandemic ever until this one came along. So it's been eclipsed But anyway, so I'm not I don't buy into the the Background data that gets forced on people. So I'm I'm with you on that The the thing that I don't want to throw the baby out with the bathwater. No pun intended Vaccines have have use and there are useful vaccines over time. We don't really I'm a medical doctor I did primary care for 30 something years and um, we don't really see german measles anymore Rabella is an issue in pregnancy. There's rubella syndrome. We don't really see rubella syndrome anymore So there are vaccines that work and have been useful smallpox. We don't see anymore Anyway, I want to get to the point. I understand there's gonna be pushback But but but my real point is that that insafar is arguing at this point. I'm like 90 Some percentage agreement with you.

[01:25:00]

You know a genuine vaccine is prior to an illness. This has always been the case I think they made huge factual errors and and stipulation errors for whatever reason I think they you know, it was kind of kind of a forced experiment on people They they'd needn't have done the mri platform and they had an adenovirus a flu shot And there's a lot of other ways in which this was a complete bollocks up thing They gave it to people that already had the illness So the the the pushback I would give about this vaccine not being safe is that it was never done prior It was not done the way vaccines were Dr. Fauci himself 2005 or four And I was talking whatever, you know, severe flu is happening that year And he was asked should people who've had this flu get this flu shot and he was like "no they should not get this because anybody. Anybody who has had the illness has perfect immunity you've seen the entire virus A vaccine is only one little tiny protein. You're only gonna get..."

anyway. So so the thank you, I'll be here all night the last point I have a number of other points. I mean the you you bring out the fact that omicron came out But basically the problem with this vaccine a lot of the the problem is that there was no real benefit because it was not given in 2019 The way a normal flu shot would have been and it was given after the fact and many people had already had the illness So you're you're working on the problem of having antibody antibody dependent enhancement and a lot of secondary problems from this This shot which was no longer acting like a vaccine plus the virus itself had mutate. I got one quick example I'll leave it back to you. The example I have is the Alec Baldwin conundrum So if we stipulate there there are a lot of Baldwins' There's four Baldwin brothers and let's say Alec is the most dangerous. He punches paparazzi shoots people And so if he was the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and let's stipulate that is quasi-danger I don't think it was that day from the diamond princess It was never the the problem that was it was foisted upon us to be so so but let's say he's the most dangerous of the Alec Baldwin Brother of the Baldwin brothers and so the police at your party you're not gonna let this son of a bitch get in So they all get pictures of Alec Baldwin. That's type of immunity. They're your immune system They're not gonna let Alec Baldwin in So so they're pretty good if you have prior to the fact before he shows up at your party using to shoot somebody But but in this case Alec Bones already been put in jail. He's already all left the scene SARS-CoV-2 is scar's coved to his left the scene And now you're left with the Daniel Billy Steven Baldwin's and those are the alpha beta delta variants and so forth and and they are substantially less dangerous than, but there's they could still You know punch a paparazzi, I guess you know and so your guards some some will let some of the Baldwin brothers in some of the time It says not so this was always an imperfect experiment as far as the vaccine go and does yeah I'll get to the quick point So there's no real point in in giving this after the fact because Baldwin's already left the scene and at this point when Omicron showed up It's really Haley Baldwin. She's not a danger Okay, so so so I'm with you for the most part I think this was only risk and it was no benefit because they gave it to the wrong age groups if they had so the thing I would push back As far as vaccine efficacy this vaccine I Think they should have just given it to people at risk from coronavirus, which was elderly and that's that

[01:28:18] [Steve Kirsch]

So where can you tell me where I said I've looked at the record level evidence, which is the the gold standard There's nothing better than that. There is no more Better gold standard evidence ground zero level. Where is the evidence that you should give it to the elderly?

[01:28:35] [Dr. Randy Bock]

Well, I agree again I agree with most of what you say because this was given anachronistically This was given this vaccine was given after SARS-CoV-2 had left the scene

[01:28:44] [Steve Kirsch]

look You just said that you should give it to the elderly. I'm asking for your evidence Data the evidence

[01:28:52] [Dr. Randy Bock]

the evidence I would give is that vaccines of this type like the flu shot would be beneficial Prior to the thing so I'm like again

[01:28:59] [Steve Kirsch]

not no Let me explain what evidence is evidence is data and if you have record level data I want to see it if you don't have record level data Do you have record level data that shows that it's beneficial for the elderly?

[01:29:13] [Dr. Randy Bock]

I stipulated that I'm 90% in agreeing with you because this is a flawed experiment on human beings I'm with you most of the way. This is a horrible experiment that was done

[01:29:22] [Steve Kirsch]

Okay, all right next question

[01:29:34] [Audience Male] Steve first, thank you very much. Have you followed the speaking of Dr. David Martin to the European Parliament about the origins of COVID the patenting of the COVID-19 vaccine in April of 2019 by Moderna the development of the COVID-19 by the US government USAID Do you follow Dr. David Martin?

[01:29:55] [Steve Kirsch] Yes? So yes,

[01:30:00] and it is troubling to me that there is this long nucleotide sequence which is in the Moderna patent which is also in SARS-CoV-2 How did it get there and? Moderna was asked that question. How did the sequence this long sequence in the patent get into the SARS-CoV-2 virus, how did that happen and I Think the CEO said let me check on that and I'll get back to you We are still waiting We're still waiting to find out the answer. There must be a reason for how this sequence found in the Moderna patent God its way into the virus We'll hear about that someday. I'm sure maybe in 75 years from now Which is the new gold standard that the FDA endorses for releasing safety data on a vaccine John

[01:31:00] [Audience-John] Thanks, Steve You talked about data transparency and how we need it there is one state that has probably the most powerful public health data Transparency bill that has been proposed Jason Gerhard submitted it in New Hampshire. We have We have some new New Hampshire people here now a few Few state reps Emily Phillips is a co-sponsor of that bill. She's up in the crowd And you may not know Jason Gerhard and Yuri Paulov brought me in to speak with the Attorney General of New Hampshire and the Criminal Justice Bureau Chief It was supposed to be 30 minutes. It went 45. They were still engaged Yuri and Jason get up to leave and I'm like, what are you doing? We're still talking so it It it ended with a with a walk out the door after I got him to laugh. I got the smiles to drop the mirror faces my question to you is After you read it, I hope you will consider supporting it publicly because again This is probably the the greatest public health transparency bill around so I hope you'll support than

[01:32:22] [Steve Kirsch] I have been talking to the people in New Hampshire I just you know, they said that they wanted to keep a pretty low profile so they don't get the torpedoed But yeah, I'm totally this is absolutely the right thing to do and I'll say another thing about data transparency Which is there is a governor in the United States of America? That I think within the next few months We'll make a bold move and make these that that Record level data public in his state. I know who he is

[01:33:05] [Audience-Female]

I have like no voice isn't MIT still mandating the vaccine?

[01:33:16] [Steve Kirsch] no not to not to my knowledge

[01:33:18] [Audience-Female2] Why do you still call it a vaccine?

[01:33:20] [Steve Kirsch]

I Just call it a vaccine because that's how I could call it the shot or the jab You know whatever. I'm just I'm just trying to relate. I'm hoping that this I don't want to just talk to to us I don't want to have an echo chamber. I want to I want to talk to people who believe that it who think the vax it's a vaccine and so I'm trying to to Communicate in a language that those people understand about what it is. So I'm trying to be kind

[01:33:56] [Audience-Female2] Did you know xxx is speaking here next week? - The Moderna guy

[01:34:00] [Steve Kirsch] Yeah, you know I'd love to ask him a few questions about that But I kind of don't think they're gonna let me ask any questions That's kind of the way it works, Yeah,

[01:34:00] [Steve Vitar]

First I want to thank you for this talk today, and I just want to thank the MIT students for hosting this So my name is my name is Steve Vitar I'm an electrical and computer engineer I've been teaching at Worcester Polytechnic Institute for over 22 years My red pill moment was when I had a young man sitting my office asking for special accommodations because he instantly had a heart attack to the Pfizer booster and Then was being treated for my recorditis So that was my red pill moment

[01:35:00]

And that's when I did the deep dive in the same data that you showed the adverse event reporting system And I saw all the increases and reports on the COVID vaccine. I was wondering why isn't the CDC Seeing the red flags if I can see them and I'm not even trained for that By January of 2022 just a few months later WPI had on record seven student deaths Which they attributed to suicide except that I knew one of those young men his name was Tyler Larson from Pelham, New Hampshire He was on crew team He's found dead in his dorm room, and it wasn't a suicide So I know those vaccines are harmful especially to that cohort And I'm standing here today because I care about these young students people and I know the vaccine is harmful to them I've been trying to get the word out on my campus [audience applause] And so Thank you, I applaud the work that you're doing I Am one that can appreciate the graphs So thank you for all that work. I guess my question to you is I do believe this has been a deliberate attempt by our government And maybe the governments of the world to harm people So and it's it's dangerous. We're living in a time where I just cannot believe what our government is doing So what do you think is the most important thing that we should be doing?

[01:36:23] [Steve Kirsch]

Yeah You know I think that the thing that's gonna shift this is not my giving talks It's people it's when people like Paul Offit Wake up in the morning and say what side of history do I want to be on today? And it's gonna take people like Paul Offit Switching from supporting the vaccines and saying the vaccines are safe to switching sides and joining us on the right side of history and and start advocating for truth and transparency and That's when it will shift it will shift when people who people Respect and trust switch sides and the more people that do that the faster this will change and I have reached out to Paul Offit To say Paul I have record level data Do you want to see the record level data and do you want the tools I used to analyze it because you can find the same thing And his response was [mentally] "I don't want to talk to him" and That is the problem None of these people who can make a difference Want to look at the data. they do not want to see the truth and It is going to take a lot of people It's going to take epidemiologists Who are not afraid of losing their job and destroying their career? We're not afraid to do that in order to speak the truth And I hope that this presentation that I made today will encourage people to say enough is Enough I'm not going to take it anymore and I'm going to start speaking out Because you know I Asked These AI chatbots you know chat GPT I asked hey have there been any people who are who Become anti-vaxxers that switched over to being pro vaccine and The chatbot says yes, there are plenty of them like Dell big tree and you know And they've listed people who are like man these guys are like totally in our camp here And so chat GPT is Completely blue-pilled. I mean it's unbelievable like I'm not making this stuff up. I mean I posted it on Twitter That the response but it's going to take people to A lot of people to flip sides or Paul Offit could do it single-handedly if Paul Offit single-handedly got red-pilled and And can he chose to look at the data and he realized that yeah the jig is up Look, you know the longer these people refuse to look at the data. They're more they are discrediting their Their their community the more they discredit the medical community the medical community now has an opportunity To look at this data and analyze it themselves and verify everything I said today

[01:40:00]

The longer they avoid doing this the deeper the whole they will dig themselves into and the first rule of Holes is when you find yourself in one stop digging

[01:40:00] [Audience Team-Reality-C Twitter]

Hi, Steve I'm over here right here Hi, so I'm actually Team Reality CT if anyone knows on Twitter Yeah, so I am running the national stop college mandates This is stopcollegemandates.org. I do want to just give credit to Adam and Spencer. I have to tell you We have been at this for two and a half years and I'm telling you it's single digits How many college kids will get involved in this and it's painful and it really needs to happen at that level When we interviewed and did the rally at Yale we had Naomi Wolf there and Every single student that we talked to privately they knew of a child or a pair I should say That had a menstrual issues strokes. They had you know embellisms They had it was incredible and they still got the booster. They would not buck the system It was absolutely incredible. So I do want to thank you I absolutely want to talk to you after this, but Steve. I'm really curious about how do we wake up that generation Because that's our biggest challenge. I think the kids in college high school They need to just stand up and say no more There's 74 colleges that are still mandating in our country. This is absolutely an Abomination, I mean it's criminal at this point. We need to we need to build a case for criminal You know and actually sue so I'm hoping some people will go to our website and sign our petition There's also a student declaration. You should know about this. It's studentdeclaration2023.org , okay, if you can sign that that would be wonderful. I appreciate your time and everything you're doing

[01:42:23] [Steve Kirsch]

Yeah, thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you for everything you're doing to to get rid of the mandates on campus It is going to be a long battle. I think it the only way that the needle shifts is for again The people like Paul Offit or Peter Hotez You know like look Peter Hotez if Peter Hotez went anti-vax. It's all done It's it's all over So so I think these people need to go and look in the mirror and say look how much longer Do I think I can get away with avoiding this data. the data is out there Paul Offit knows the data is out there. I guarantee you Paul Offit knows the data is out there The question is how long do people like him? believe that they can simply avoid the truth Because this is not sustainable what they're doing. They're living on short on a short time fuse right now and the longer they delay the worse They look and the more they discredit their profession

[01:43:28] [Audience-Female3]

Hi, I wanted to point out is that the CDC is regionalizing health boards in the state of Massachusetts So that they can actually circumvent Local boards of health that are elected and appointed officials of a town so there it's done with a grant and The grant is like oh well We'll give you this money and you can do a regionalization So a town like Halifax is being grouped with tau and in like big cities and not even The towns that are like Halifax and it's all to have the CDC rules So when you ask why this is occurring it's because under the cover of grants Such as the Federal Cares Act which allows the lowering of Quorums at town meetings and it's all done because we don't go to town meeting It is the easiest thing you can do you can watch Netflix every day Whatever time it's not like family ties is on at seven o'clock on a Sunday and you have to do that with your family anymore Go to the stupid town meeting and vote Why do your taxes go up because you didn't go to town meeting and vote so when you say They are doing this no you are get up and go vote at your town meeting

[01:45:00] [Steve Kirsch]

Thank you

[01:45:05] [Audience-Male3]

Hi, thank you So as a graduate of this institution I I greatly respect your-reviewed literature and You mentioned the Cleveland Clinic study, which is fantastic And then you probably know the one in vaccine that from the FOIA data from Pfizer Is there any you know that is there any effort to take your data and have it make its way through the peer-reviewed literature?

[01:45:32] [Steve Kirsch]

Yes, so we're writing up my My results in a paper or some a co-author On that it's being written by someone who works for me So I don't have to worry that it's not gonna happen and it's been reviewed by an editor of the peer-reviewed journal And he wants to publish it and so we're just fine-tuning it right now

So they won't be able to say Well, we'll look at it when it's in the peer-reviewed literature because that time is coming Real soon now and there's no way they're gonna be able to stop it either

[01:46:11] [Audience-Male4]

Hi, Steve Really appreciate this of course great to see it all in one place and put together as you've done I'm curious whether you have any other targets for your debate people

[01:46:23] [Steve Kirsch]

Target's what do you mean by targets?

[01:46:27] [Audience-Male4]

You know for the you want to challenge to a debate and you know you offer you the million dollars or whatever Do you others anyone left that you're looking at?

[01:46:36] [Steve Kirsch]

You know I wish because I'm kind of looking I could always use an extra million or more and You know so I'm looking to bet people I I offered a million dollars to anybody in the world who would Take my million dollars and the bet is I bet the vaccines killed more people than they saved now you know why I made the bet and It's a neutral panel of judges that decides it. There's only one guy in the world Who accepted it and he said I'm only gonna do it for half a half a million? But if I like the judges, I'll go higher so So there is one guy from Israel who accepted my million dollar bet so the thing the interesting thing is that They're willing to bet your life That they are correct, but they're not willing to bet their money that they are correct Isn't that interesting I Know you know it's like big hat no cattle, right? They they talk big and they're willing to risk your life over it, but they're not willing to risk their money Now Moderna won't risk their money and Pfizer won't risk their money. They're not standing behind their product Why if the if the vaccines are safe and effective why wouldn't Pfizer or Moderna? Want to challenge me and win and prove that Their vaccine is safe because they know it's not

[01:48:01] [Audience-Male5]

I'd like to suggest Steve I'd like to suggest a pivot Could you consider perhaps Offering that same kind of a money to Anyone who would be a whistleblower Because what we need is the real you've got the you know the record level data what we need is the intent and The intent is only going to come from internal documentation that we cannot possibly access without a whistleblower A whistleblower would need support if they were to come forward. It's be very difficult to you know hide Perhaps and the money would be towards them their legal fees

[01:48:48] [Steve Kirsch]

Yeah, so I'm totally willing to do that You can use the contact me link there is already a checkbox for whistleblowers and you just name your price so I mean The CDC would want to do the same thing right? I'm sure the FDA has a program like that where they they want to find out intent for whistleblowers Isn't there a CDC program where you can you know like I can show that that they fudge the data or they fabric like where Where is the CDC program surely there must be a CDC and FDA program for that isn't there No way what does that tell you? Yeah, yeah It's hard to be a whistleblower nowadays right because you know their whistleblower rejection laws, but they don't necessarily work the way they were intended

[01:49:52] [Audience-Male6]

Good good evening Steve,

[01:49:55] [Steve Kirsch]

but and by the way this whistleblower in New Zealand Sorry the whistleblower in New Zealand

[01:50:00]

He made an enormous risk No, it's a he He made an enormous risk in disclosing this data. He could go to jail. He could be killed There are lots of things that could happen to this guy this guy is a hero and , please go give a round of applause for him Because it's people like that that are willing to sacrifice everything To get the truth out because they are so disgusted With what is happening and how many people have been killed by their government that they are willing to sacrifice their life their future in order to get the word out and And this whistleblower has my undying gratitude and I will absolutely help this whistleblower Get another job It's probably not going to be keeping his for very long and do anything I can to help him because he has done an An incredible service to humanity in making this data public

[01:51:11] [Audience-Male6]

So one, question one comment The question is how can the CDC the FDA ignore the open-VAERS data? It is so compelling That's the question and for those people that believe in vaccines if you want the true story There's a book called "Turtles all the way down" If you read that book for the people down there you read that book, even polio, You'll question if any vaccine that's ever been developed is effective and safe

[01:51:44] [Steve Kirsch]

And I totally agree with that there's no evidence that any of these vaccines are safe and effective They're not. none of them are tested against placebo for safety and as far as Effectiveness the way we find out whether they're effective is to look at the record level data that's never disclosed. So nobody knows but it sure seems like what happens is these viruses come out They burn themselves out and then a vaccine is introduced and then they declare victory and It is amazing how often that happens So if the vaccines really worked why are they never disclosing the record level data They have the data, and Medicare it could be exposed. They're never for any vaccine. They are never ever Disclosing that information there must be a reason I can't figure it out And as far as the VAERS like how can they ignore the various data? It's easy. They just ignore it That's that's the way it works. We're the federales. We don't need no data We don't have no we don't you know they don't look at it That you know they actually did look at their data and they found 770 different safety signals That means this is this adverse event is of is a huge problem This class of adverse events is a huge problem 770 different classes of adverse events That is like the house is on fire. What did they do? They did nothing The only reason that we know about the 770 safety signals that were triggered and I'm not talking about 770 people I'm talking about pulmonary embolism is one of the safety signals. I'm talking about Cancer is one of the safety signals. I'm to that's what I'm talking about. I said safety signals 770 the buildings on fire. What did they do? They did nothing the only way we found out about that is because Somebody did a freedom of information act request on the CDC and they discovered that the CDC had the alarm bells Are going off throughout the building? 770 fires throughout the building of the CDC and the CDC did nothing They did absolutely nothing. It's in the public record. It's a freedom of information act request Anybody can do that. they do nothing. They are corrupt. There is no question about it That organization needs a big overhaul

[01:54:16] [Audience-Female4]

Yes, I don't think So hi Thank you so much and thank you to over there as well the young students I want to bring up the word whistleblower and It it really Blows my mind that if everyone stood up there is no whistleblower It's that everyone stands up and I see it in communities that I'm in and everyone's talking about You know the the information about the job and how bad it is, but they don't speak up

[01:55:00]

And I it's kind of like it's a good day for dying It's like speak up because if everyone spoke up then the tables would turn and And it whether it's about money or not money. It's about if everyone that knows the truth Professors whomever. if they all stood up the table would turn Do you know what I mean? It's like so simple

[01:55:31] [Steve Kirsch]

Yeah, if everybody got together follow the doctors at UCSF and by the way, none of them I think none of the doctors at UCSF are getting any more jabs. They all know that it kills people They're not getting it themselves. They're not

[01:55:31] [Audience-Female4]

that's what I mean where everyone has their own level of fear Whether it's about money or ridicule or whatever so But if the majority of people that knew the truth Stood up they wouldn't lose their jobs Because the majority spoke the other little glimmer of light that I would like to also share is People that I know Who have constantly gotten gotten the job and the boosters? They keep on getting covid You know and they're lightening up realizing That they're not going to do that anymore So slowly but surely light is shining but just rise up Come on

[01:56:33] [Steve Kirsch]

Yeah, I mean I Would love that to happen people are just afraid. I mean it's it's a yeah Yeah, you know they shouldn't be the the the doctors at UCSF should all get together and they all sign a letter And then they and then when everybody is signed then they make the letter public and That way they don't have to worry about like well If I go out and these other guys don't go out like I lose my job and they get they keep theirs People should be circulating These letters saying we're not going to take it anymore And then they get everybody to sign the letter and when everyone has signed they make the letter public So easy

[01:57:16] [Kevin McCurnan]

See this is going to be a bit of a softball for you Yeah, I commend you for putting out all this stuff public because I think that's that's more important. There was some some commentary here about peer review and I think the audience needs to reflect in the fact that peer review is what got us here Okay, we saw surge of fear We saw all of these journals come through and basically fabricate information to support a narrative And if that is the cathedral we're going to run all of our data through we're going to end up in the same place So I think it's really important for this audience to look at what do we care about from peer-review? What we care about is reproduction. We don't care about a bunch of our friends giving us gold stars in our papers, all right Does it reproduce if your data can be put public and others can reproduce it. That's all we care about I hope people in this audience at MIT if you're in the Bitcoin Club here You understand this concept that distributed consensus is all that matters if your enemies can reproduce your work. It's real You don't need any any GM telling you it's real because they're probably paid off I used to work in that industry. We used to pay even 2008 10 to 20 thousand dollars per page for an ad in science and nature and we bought them every month All right, so if you think the actual like Fox is paid off nature and science are far more paid off Okay, they are going to support whatever the pharmaceutical narrative is and if you think you're gonna get a fair hearing in that In that scenario, you're sadly mistaken. Okay, so Put it public let others interrogate it and and I think peer review is very important But it's no longer trustworthy in the hands that we've trusted it with in the past I'm sorry, I'm Kevin McCurnan. I spent some time here on campus

[01:59:08] [Steve Kirsch]

So so Kevin is actually working on a new project to do exactly what he was talking about and by the way Kevin McCurnan for those who don't know him he he came to fame recently because of this little issue of DNA contamination or Or as we like to call it adulteration So he found this stuff Including the SV40 promoter sequence in the Pfizer vaccine that is not Supposed to be there, and not only that we had a nice little chat on Zoom and and I asked a question about well Shouldn't like. how did this happen and Kevin was saying well, you know as soon as you enter the sequence into the What's the name of that program?

[02:00:00]

snap gene yeah, yeah as soon as you enter the sequence into snap gene. snap gene says "hey SV40 promoters SV40 promoter sequence" and so somebody had to do the active work to erase That sequence from the diagram before it was given to the FDA in That words they knew there was a problem They deliberately held it from the FDA and you know what the FDA doesn't give a damn that they were fooled It's like. it's like I'm waiting for the FDA to give Pfizer the "Fool-Us award" You know for fooling them on the SV40 promoter sequence because the FDA in any reasonable society The FDA should be livid about this they should call for an investigation and somebody should go to jail for this And what we have is an FDA that says we're not going to investigate it We don't need to investigate it We know you know we don't have to do anything What Safe and effective and that's the way it goes so when Kevin finds this huge safety problem There is no money from the FDA to fund whether or not this thing can permanently rearrange or change your DNA and so the FDA can say well, there's no evidence that it causes harm of course There's no evidence because you decided not to fund the research to uncover the evidence That is how it works That's how the game is played Yeah, John

[02:01:56] [Audience John]

Thank you You guys might know that I'm more on the criminal track But with regard to all the civil liability everybody knows about the prep act the willful misconduct exception What Kevin found is extremely instrumental in proving the case in the court of law because strict liability standard is for a manufacturing defect Your burden of proof is much less for a design defect. You'd have to prove a reasonable alternative design It's a long drawn-out process of negligence within court, but what Kevin did was unlock the The Willfullness conduct exception of the prep act and then as cases move forward the manufacturing defect You don't have to prove a reasonable alternative design You only have to prove that the product that was shipped did not meet the safety spec that the manufacturer put out They came up with a spec. They're not meeting their own spec. So product escapes into the stream stream of commerce all standard terms That I'm using so it's just really important that people understand that the game is on and we go after him you go and then we get And then we pierce the corporate veil, we go to the executives take all the money back They knew they should have known, nobody should have made money on these products. I go to the gym I see the guys from Moderna. I live around here. So Norwood's their big manufacturing facilities and Hey, they're oven parties every Friday the wine and beer are flowing They got free gourmet lunches all the time. They live in high on the hog as they kill people. So thanks Thanks Kevin and thank you Steve for doing this.

[02:03:29] [MSOI Moderator]

Whose got the mic next We'll take one last question all right Go ahead

[02:03:47] [Audience-Female5] [Steve Kirsch] Thank you very much. So this I believe Go that is the tip of the iceberg if we do the data analysis of every vaccine that's ever been given From the beginning the death rate the destruction the loss of family wealth The loss of livelihoods of people everywhere. I go. I see more and more and more dysfunctional I'm sorry. I don't need to use that word people. I teach in a high school My kids are sick My kids cannot think they are all getting their boosters because they want to play their sports If we do the real analysis, which I think your wonderful team could do We will see that this is truly a takedown of the American people in the world people by I believe a super elite that Professor Quigley refused to name Because he didn't want to be killed They've been named now. Let's look. Let's reveal it. Let's accept it We are at war

[02:05:00] [MSOI Moderator]

Well, I hope we can give another big round of applause for Steve Kirsch tonight [Standing Ovation]

There's some wonderful websites for Mr. Steve Kirsch. Thank you very much for coming over and talking about this Imagine the world if all this data if the world knows about these data if the mainstream media the medical and academia complex Did not suppress this. all these data? On Monday November 27th, we sent out one of the more popular tweets on Steve Kirsch's account It was actually the dorm spam in which we emailed 5,000 undergraduates at MIT This guy is gonna cross the Rubicon y'all should come well I think in every sense of the word, tonight the Rubicon has been crossed Because tonight we have done something that has not been pierced in a long time We know that the people know what's going on in their skeptical But the academic and the government bubbles remain as resolute as ever. the glass could not be pierced Well as the MSOI tonight we have just ruptured their glass bubble and we will not be denied Two hundred and forty eight years ago in 1775 there was the shot heard around the world which you're all familiar with because you're from the region It was 30 miles west of here in Concord, Massachusetts, and tonight I think in two ways We have heard. we have fired the shot heard around the world The first way with Kirsch presenting the record level data from New Zealand showing Israel as well and many other sources We now have the vindication and in the second way we as the MSO I we will continue to rise And we will never back down as we have in our previous events. Let's keep this going We're going to need your support and I hope that this can be the beginning of a big community No one knows what's going on on the horizon It is a very complicated affair no doubt and some of us are intimidated and we don't know where to begin But I can tell you that if we don't know where to start start somewhere find your friends find your local community and keep building When we started MSOI there was probably the two of us and maybe a few other individuals But we never said we were going to quit and we kept going and look at what we got today And I want to end with this. I hope that as we have done as Mr. Kirsch has done and we should all embrace this We must love and fight for our freedom more than we are scared of the consequences for doing so And in the words of Benjamin Franklin if we all hang together instead of separately we can win

[02:08:52] [Steve Kirsch]

Thank you all for coming and I'll be here till nine o'clock So if you have any questions and want to talk to me or get any selfies or whatever I'm here for you

SteveKirschMITPresentationwMSOI (last edited 2023-12-10 10:35:49 by Jade)